Which standard ensures that arguments presented in analysis are coherent and logical?

The standard that ensures that arguments presented in analysis are coherent and logical is best described by logic standards. Logic standards focus on the structure of reasoning and the relationships between propositions to ensure that conclusions follow logically from premises. This means that analysis must be not only coherent—flowing in a way that makes sense—but also valid—where the arguments hold together logically without contradictions.

Understanding logic standards is crucial in the context of counter-insider threat professionals, as it allows for clear reasoning in identifying patterns of behavior that may indicate potential threats. When making assessments or recommendations based on analysis, having a strong foundation in logical reasoning helps in effectively communicating findings and justifying decisions.

In contrast, while intellectual standards may include assessing the quality of thought, clarity standards focus on the clear expression of ideas, and depth standards emphasize thoroughness in analysis, these do not specifically target the logical coherence of the arguments being made. Thus, logic standards are central to developing sound arguments in analysis, ensuring that the reasoning presented is not only understandable but also valid.