Which option is NOT considered a reason for reporting insider threats according to DITMAC?

The rationale for identifying social engagement issues as not a reason for reporting insider threats lies in the primary focus of insider threat programs. Insider threats typically concentrate on actions and behaviors that directly jeopardize organizational security, sensitive information, or intellectual property.

Espionage concerns, criminal conduct, and behavioral considerations all relate to significant risks that can lead to security breaches or compromises. Espionage, in particular, pertains to unauthorized information gathering that can be detrimental to national security or competitive advantage. Criminal conduct encompasses illegal activities that could harm the organization or its stakeholders, while behavioral considerations involve monitoring patterns and actions that may forewarn future insider threats.

Social engagement issues, on the other hand, generally reflect interpersonal dynamics and personal relationships rather than tangible threats to security or data integrity. While they may play a role in the overall workplace environment, they do not directly pertain to the core mission of insider threat reporting, which is focused on protecting sensitive information and infrastructure from malicious insider actions. This distinction clarifies why social engagement issues are not prioritized within the framework of reporting insider threats according to DITMAC guidelines.