Which is NOT considered a CI mitigation response?

Conducting internal audits for compliance is not typically considered a counter-intelligence (CI) mitigation response. CI mitigation responses are strategies specifically aimed at reducing the risk of insider threats, which may involve direct interaction with personnel, fostering a culture of security awareness, and preparing for potential threats.

The first option, coordinating development of sources, directly pertains to enhancing intelligence and awareness around potential threats from insiders. This involves identifying and developing resources to monitor and mitigate insider risks.

Providing foreign travel briefs and debriefs is another proactive measure aimed at protecting sensitive information. Such briefings help employees understand the risks associated with their travels and the specific threats they may face from foreign actors.

Developing countermeasures like training materials is essential in educating personnel about recognizing and responding to insider threats. This training is vital in creating a security-conscious culture and ensuring all members understand their role in protecting sensitive information.

In contrast, while conducting internal audits for compliance is important for ensuring adherence to regulations and standards, it doesn't specifically address insider threats. Internal audits are more focused on organizational compliance and operational efficiency rather than counter-intelligence strategies tailored to mitigate insider risks.