What is a consequence of humans compulsively creating explanations for events?

The tendency of humans to compulsively create explanations for events often leads to the reinforcement of incorrect beliefs. When individuals try to make sense of a situation, they may fill in gaps with assumptions or cognitive biases rather than relying on factual evidence. This inclination can create a narrative that fits their existing understanding or beliefs, even if that narrative is inaccurate or misleading.

By consistently formulating explanations without sufficient grounding in empirical data, individuals may become more entrenched in their misconceptions. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in contexts involving insider threats, where misunderstandings about motivations and behaviors can lead to misguided approaches and ineffective countermeasures. Consequently, the belief system that is shaped could be flawed, potentially leading to further inaccuracies in decision-making and perceptions related to threats.

In contrast, while developing accurate insights, enhancing reasoning skills, and acknowledging empirical evidence are valuable processes, they do not typically result from the compulsion to create explanations. Engaging with objective facts and critical thinking usually counters the urge to accept unfounded beliefs.