What aspect of analytic judgments should be explained according to analytic standards?

The aspect of analytic judgments that should be explained according to analytic standards is the consistency or change in analytic judgments over time. This focus is vital because understanding how analytic judgments evolve or remain stable can provide critical insight into the reliability and validity of the analyses presented. Analyzing trends in judgments helps to evaluate the impact of new information, changes in circumstances, or shifts in the analytical framework.

Regularly revisiting how and why judgments have shifted also promotes transparency and accountability within the analytic process. This practice can enhance trust among stakeholders and ensure that decisions are based on sound reasoning and evidence, rather than fleeting impressions or unexamined biases.

While other choices touch on important elements related to analysis and data, they do not focus specifically on the aspect of explaining the continuity or changes in analytic reasoning itself, which is crucial for establishing a robust foundation for sound decision-making and risk assessment in counter-insider threat analysis.